ConcreteGalahad Member Member
# 127298
|
posted February 13, 2003 05:16 AM
Hi there I
belive that I have a an idea to make One Power counter weaving
more bookish then the rules allow with out (or at least I
think without) changing any other game mechanics. This idea is
the abort manuever. I feel the idea simulates counter weaving
more accuratly as in the books it seems to be more reactionary
while using the rules (having to ready an action) it seems to
prepared.
Abort Manuevers (borowed from the mess
that is Fuzion)
bassically if you are attacked with the
One Power you may sacrifice one of you next attacks in this
round or the next to counterspell if you male a weave sight
check and so on.
Example Here we have
channeler 1 and channeler 2 *rolls inits* channeler 1
is going first and channeler 2 goes second
Channeler 1
weaves up a fire ball and launches it at channeler 2 whom
makes a weave site check and is able to weave of a fire ball
to counter. Although channeler 2 now doesn't have an attack
for this round (or one less if channeler 2 had more then 1).
Example2 Same scenario as above but
channeler 2 did not abort an action since it wasn't worth it.
So channeler 2 now weaver a fire ball at channeler 1...Uh Oh
channeler 1 has already used an action this round. This mean
that channeler 1's action in the up coming round (or one of
them is channeler 1 has more) is sacrificed to abort and
counter weave.
Like I said before I feel that aborting
has more of the reactionary feel that readying an action
doesn't have and simulates what I feel the books portray.
Well I hope that this post has made enough sense to
get my point across and jsut isn't random
babling.
[ February 13, 2003, 05:16 AM: Message
edited by: ConcreteGalahad ]
From:
Canada Eh! | Registered: Feb 2003 |
IP: Logged
|