Author
|
Topic: Cross
Bonding... |
theSaj
Member Member # 96041
|
posted October 30, 2002 10:18 AM
Could an
Asha'man and an Aes Sedai cross bond each other?
It
would be an interesting weave...stronger than even a bond. And
very advantageous. You get the benefits of allowing each other
to strengthen (Hit Point sharing, etc.)
I would think
such might also something sorta like linking. The idea is if
in close proximity, one can overchannel at a reduced level.
(In other words, it would function like a +1 link, except only
on a full overchannel.)
I think it would be very
interesting to have a cross-linked bond between a male and
female channeller...extremely intimate as
well.
-------------------- "To Die is to Live No
More!"
From:
New Haven, Connecticut | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
| |
Freya
Member Member # 93267
|
posted October 30, 2002 10:36 AM
quote:
Originally posted by theSaj: Could an
Asha'man and an Aes Sedai cross bond each other?
I
think it would be very interesting to have a cross-linked
bond between a male and female channeller...extremely
intimate as well.
Our game has an additional country addded to Randland
where there are male and female channelers. In that country,
bonding is more intimate. Married channelers bond
eachother, or channelers bond their non-channeler spouse.
Those are the only bonds done, period.
(There was an
NPC couple who both channeled and were married. They were a
force to be reckoned with when linked...nearly psychic
synchronization)
So, yes, i agree that channelers can
bond eachother. And yes, i agree that it would
definately be more intimate. ![[Blush]](Wizards_Com Boards Cross Bonding___fichiers/blush.gif)
-------------------- felicia AKA Freya
Culadin
From:
dallas,tx | Registered: Jul 2002 |
IP: Logged
| |
tremerelord
Member Member # 110819
|
posted October 30, 2002 06:27 PM
I agree, it
would be very intimate, but mechanically would it change
anything? Maybe making something new up like my Higher Bond in
the Gaidon Sedai PrC. Or maybe it wouldn't change anything
other than role play potential. Interesting though. ![[Wink]](Wizards_Com Boards Cross Bonding___fichiers/wink.gif)
-------------------- I know you believe
you understand what it is you think I said, but I'm not sure
what you heard isn't what I really meant.
From:
Niles,Ohio | Registered: Oct 2002 |
IP: Logged
| |
aleshandre
Member Member # 27286
|
posted October 31, 2002 04:27 AM
quote:
Originally posted by theSaj: I would think
such might also something sorta like linking. The idea is if
in close proximity, one can overchannel at a reduced level.
(In other words, it would function like a +1 link, except
only on a full overchannel.)
I don't think it would affect channelling except when
they are accually linked. I do however think that it might
give a very different emotional sharing effect... like the
fact that each would not only know how the other feels, but
how much of themselves the other experiences all of which
would be sent back and forth and build upon it'self to a
nearly overwhelming level until the 2 become used to it. (in game terms for 1d6 weeks x the total level of
the characters, all atributes take a temp loss of 5 points)
imho it would likely result in a sharing of thoughts as well
as emotions and physical sensations... also it would probably
eliminate the ability to compel the other through the bond.
![[Blush]](Wizards_Com Boards Cross Bonding___fichiers/blush.gif)
-------------------- Stupidity is not a
crime, so you're free to go. Normal people frighten me.
I've never heard of freinds or relatives of serial killers
saying, "He was crazy, I knew he was going to snap sooner or
later and start killing people". They always seem to say, "He
was such a nice normal young man", etc. Atleast with
crazy people, you know to watch your back! My web page, new
& improved: http://geocities.com/aleshandre@sbcglobal.net/
From:
temple,tx,usa | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
| | |